Woodlot Management in the Anthropocene

The modern urban life has made a fetish of the idea of wilderness, a landscape untouched by human hand. It is a powerful image that has done much good in the past century by helping preserve from grasping industrialists some real gems of the natural world in the form of national parks.

But one might argue persuasively that the very act of setting aside some land to remain “untouched” albeit with interpretive nature centers, hygienic toilets, washrooms and campgrounds and state of the art asphalt roadbeds for scenic motoring, has led to greater exploitation of the non-wilderness world. After all, if we are preserving some beautiful national parks then the rest of the landscape is fair game.

This fetish is one that we all have internalized. I know for myself how powerful the allure of wilderness is in how I view Cindy’s and my farm. But the concept doesn’t hold up upon closer scrutiny. The human species has impacted life and terrain across the globe. The unflattering term ecologists now use for the current epoch is Anthropocene: a period in earth’s history when the impact of human existence shapes both the natural world and its climate.

All of this brings me to discuss our decision to begin working our woods as part of our productive use of our land. The current model for woodlot management is to strip it of every tree of even the remotest possible economic value every fifty to sixty years. Bring in heavy equipment, build roads to get the logs out and abandon the land to heal itself. We only have to walk to the back of our property to gaze out at that example, fifty acres of former forest, denuded into gullies getting deeper after every storm.

I have many old farming texts in my library that remind me that the idea of sustainably managing woodlots so that they are in continual production is not new. It makes sense and I understand the concept intellectually and practically. But we both wrestled with the idea of cutting any trees down for base commerce. There was a sense that to care for our land meant farming the open pasture areas, that the woods were somehow sacrosanct. Even though the woods have been logged, and not well, countless times.

The man must surely get tired of being referenced, but a recent article by Wendell Berry on sustainable logging had us rethinking our relationship to our woods. It inspired us to devise a template of sorts to allow us to harvest firewood and timber on a rotating basis. The template divides our woods in eight woodlots with a two-year harvest timeline.

This is all in the preliminary stages of execution. The next two years are a learning period. And there is a lot to decide on and discuss as we move forward. The practicalities of selecting cull trees and market trees, cutting bulk firewood, cutting and felling trees safely and without damaging other trees, removing the logs without scarring the land or removing topsoil, dividing the woods into woodlots, selling timber on the market or to farm customers are things I’ll try and address in a second post in the next couple of weeks.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Reading this weekend: Garden Earth: from hunter and gatherer to global capitalism and thereafter by Gunnar Rundgren.

FollowEmail this to someoneFollow on FacebookFollow on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterFollow on LinkedIn

6 thoughts on “Woodlot Management in the Anthropocene

  1. You’re speaking my language, though more politely than I would. I claim no expertise or wisdom whatsoever regarding “management” of natural resources such as pastures, streams, ponds, and woodlots. I wonder why we can’t just leave things alone, as nature preserves intend. Why must we alway s exploit?

    This link might be of interest to you:

    http://www.monbiot.com/2014/01/13/drowning-in-money/

    Apparently, monetary incentives for traditional approaches to landscapes create, um, problems. No surprise, since money is abstract and the land is absolutely for real. The most interesting tidbit in Monbiot’s article is that forested or wooded land absorbs around 67 times the amount of water of denuded land. So if you do clear too agressively, you might inadvertently cause flooding (lots of variables).

    • Brutus,
      Hey, thanks for the reply and the link. Amazing how seemingly small acts have bigger consequences, or, perhaps it isn’t. I don’t know if it is the case in Britain, with quite different land use patterns. But paving over a large section of the country with stripmalls and roads must play its part in flooding as well.

      There is a way, by using trees in barriers or creating swales on your land, that you can recharge the groundwater. And, in essence, by recharging the ground water you are slowing the movement of water through the soil. That creates better pastures, slower run-off into streams and all points downstream. As the effects of climate change ripple across the planet heavier and quicker rainfalls will likely be the norm. Something we have seen increasingly over the past decade.

      Just last night we were at our book club, a gathering of farmers in our part of the county. One of the main topics of our conversation was the design of natural systems to accomplish better water retention. I’ll let you know how those work out.

      Cheers,
      Brian

  2. Pingback: Woodlot Management in the Anthropocene: Part Three | The South Roane Agrarian

  3. Pingback: Woodlot Management in the Anthropocene | Equities Canada

This author dines on your input.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.